|
|
Smolyaninov, I. I., Zayats, A. V., Stanishevsky, A., & Davis, C. C. (2002). Optical control of photon tunneling through an array of nanometer-scale cylindrical channels. Phys. Rev. B, 66(20), 205414_1–205414_5.
|
|
|
|
Lee, J. - H., Kim, D. - W., Wu, Y. - H., Yu, C. - J., Lee, S. - D., & Wu, S. - T. (2005). High-speed infrared phase modulators using short helical pitch ferroelectric liquid crystals. Opt. Express, 13(20), 7732.
|
|
|
|
Seki, T., Shibata, H., Takesue, H., Tokura, Y., & Imoto, N. (2010). Comparison of timing jitter between NbN superconducting single-photon detector and avalanche photodiode. Phys. C, 470(20), 1534–1537.
Abstract: We report the pulse-to-pulse timing jitter measurement of a niobium nitride (NbN) superconducting single-photon detector (SSPD) and an InGaAs avalanche photodiode (APD) at 1550-nm wavelength. A direct comparison of their timing jitter was performed by using the same experimental configuration to measure both detectors. The measured jitter of the SSPD and the APD are 75 and 84 ps at full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), and 138 and 384 ps at full-width at tenth-maximum (FWTM), respectively. The jitter of the SSPD remains small at FWTM while that of APD is wide. We also estimated the transmission distances and secure key generation rates for fiber-based quantum key distribution (QKD) which uses these detectors. The estimated transmission distances of the APD are 86 km and 107 km with respect to 1 ns and 100 ps time windows, respectively, and those of the SSPD are 125 km and 172 km with respect to 1 ns and 100 ps time windows, respectively. This estimation indicates the SSPDЃfs advantages for QKD compared to the APD.
|
|
|
|
Mohan, N., Minaeva, O., Goltsman, G. N., Saleh, M. F., Nasr, M. B., Sergienko, A. V., et al. (2009). Ultrabroadband coherence-domain imaging using parametric downconversion and superconducting single-photon detectors at 1064 nm. Appl. Opt., 48(20), 4009–4017.
Abstract: Coherence-domain imaging systems can be operated in a single-photon-counting mode, offering low detector noise; this in turn leads to increased sensitivity for weak light sources and weakly reflecting samples. We have demonstrated that excellent axial resolution can be obtained in a photon-counting coherence-domain imaging (CDI) system that uses light generated via spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC) in a chirped periodically poled stoichiometric lithium tantalate (chirped-PPSLT) structure, in conjunction with a niobium nitride superconducting single-photon detector (SSPD). The bandwidth of the light generated via SPDC, as well as the bandwidth over which the SSPD is sensitive, can extend over a wavelength region that stretches from 700 to 1500 nm. This ultrabroad wavelength band offers a near-ideal combination of deep penetration and ultrahigh axial resolution for the imaging of biological tissue. The generation of SPDC light of adjustable bandwidth in the vicinity of 1064 nm, via the use of chirped-PPSLT structures, had not been previously achieved. To demonstrate the usefulness of this technique, we construct images for a hierarchy of samples of increasing complexity: a mirror, a nitrocellulose membrane, and a biological sample comprising onion-skin cells.
|
|
|
|
Huang, K. C. Y., Jun, Y. C., Seo, M. - K., & Brongersma, M. L. (2011). Power flow from a dipole emitter near an optical antenna. Opt. Express, 19(20), 19084–19092.
Abstract: Current methods to calculate the emission enhancement of a quantum emitter coupled to an optical antenna of arbitrary geometry rely on analyzing the total Poynting vector power flow out of the emitter or the dyadic Green functions from full-field numerical simulations. Unfortunately, these methods do not provide information regarding the nature of the dominant energy decay pathways. We present a new approach that allows for a rigorous separation, quantification, and visualization of the emitter output power flow captured by an antenna and the subsequent reradiation power flow to the far field. Such analysis reveals unprecedented details of the emitter/antenna coupling mechanisms and thus opens up new design strategies for strongly interacting emitter/antenna systems used in sensing, active plasmonics and metamaterials, and quantum optics.
|
|
