|
|
Uzawa, Y., Miki, S., Wang, Z., Kawakami, A., Kroug, M., Yagoubov, P., et al. (2002). Performance of a quasi-optical NbN hot-electron bolometric mixer at terahertz frequencies. Supercond. Sci. Technol., 15(1), 141–145.
|
|
|
|
Burke, P. J., Schoelkopf, R. J., Prober, D. E., Skalare, A., Karasik, B. S., Gaidis, M. C., et al. (1999). Mixing and noise in diffusion and phonon cooled superconducting hot-electron bolometers. J. Appl. Phys., 85(3), 1644–1653.
|
|
|
|
Ryabchun, S., Tong, C. - Y. E., Blundell, R., & Gol'tsman, G. (2009). Stabilization scheme for hot-electron bolometer receivers using microwave radiation. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 19(1), 14–19.
Abstract: We present the results of a stabilization scheme for terahertz receivers based on NbN hot-electron bolometer (HEB) mixers that uses microwave radiation with a frequency much lower than the gap frequency of NbN to compensate for mixer current fluctuations. A feedback control loop, which actively controls the power level of the injected microwave radiation, has successfully been implemented to stabilize the operating point of the HEB mixer. This allows us to increase the receiver Allan time to 10 s and also improve the temperature resolution of the receiver by about 30% in the total power mode of operation.
|
|
|
|
Ryabchun, S. A., Tretyakov, I. V., Finkel, M. I., Maslennikov, S. N., Kaurova, N. S., Seleznev, V. A., et al. (2009). NbN phonon-cooled hot-electron bolometer mixer with additional diffusion cooling. In Proc. 20th Int. Symp. Space Terahertz Technol. (pp. 151–154). Charlottesville, USA.
|
|
|
|
Cherednichenko, S., Kollberg, E., Angelov, I., Drakinskiy, V., Berg, T., & Merkel, H. (2005). Effect of the direct detection effect on the HEB receiver sensitivity calibration. In Proc. 16th Int. Symp. Space Terahertz Technol. (pp. 235–239). Göteborg, Sweden.
Abstract: We analyze the scale of the HEB receiver sensitivity calibration error caused by the so called “direct detection effect”. The effect comes from changing of the HEB parameters when whey face the calibration loads of different temperatures. We found that for HIFI Band 6 mixers (Herschel Space Observatory) the noise temperature error is of the order of 8% for 300K/77K loads (lab receiver) and 2.5% for 100K/10K loads (in HIFI). Using different approach we also predict that with an isolator between the mixer and the low noise amplifiers the error can be much smaller.
|
|
