|
Pothier, H., Guéron, S., Birge, N. O., Esteve, D., & Devoret, M. H. (1997). Energy distribution function of quasiparticles in mesoscopic wires. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79(18), 3490–3493.
Abstract: We have measured with a tunnel probe the energy distribution function of Landau quasiparticles in metallic diffusive wires connected to two reservoir electrodes, with an applied bias voltage. The distribution function in the middle of a 1.5-μm-long wire resembles the half sum of the Fermi distributions of the reservoirs. The distribution functions in 5-μm-long wires are more rounded, due to interactions between quasiparticles during the longer diffusion time across the wire. From the scaling of the data with the bias voltage, we find that the scattering rate between two quasiparticles varies as <c9><203a>–2, where <c9><203a> is the energy transferred.
|
|
|
Shah, N., Pekker, D., & Goldbart, P. M. (2008). Inherent stochasticity of superconductor-resistor switching behavior in nanowires. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 207001(1 to 4).
Abstract: We study the stochastic dynamics of superconductive-resistive switching in hysteretic current-biased superconducting nanowires undergoing phase-slip fluctuations. We evaluate the mean switching time using the master-equation formalism, and hence obtain the distribution of switching currents. We find that as the temperature is reduced this distribution initially broadens; only at lower temperatures does it show the narrowing with cooling naively expected for phase slips that are thermally activated. We also find that although several phase-slip events are generally necessary to induce switching, there is an experimentally accessible regime of temperatures and currents for which just one single phase-slip event is sufficient to induce switching, via the local heating it causes.
|
|
|
Tinkham, M., Free, J. U., Lau, C. N., & Markovic, N. (2003). Hysteretic I–V curves of superconducting nanowires. Phys. Rev. B, 68, 134515(1 to 7).
Abstract: Experimental I–V curves of superconducting MoGe nanowires show hysteresis for the thicker wires and none for the thinner wires. A rather quantitative account of these data for representative wires is obtained by numerically solving the one-dimensional heat flow equation to find a self-consistent distribution of temperature and local resistivity along the wire, using the measured linear resistance R(T) as input. This suggests that the retrapping current in the hysteretic I–V curves is primarily determined by heating effects, and not by the dynamics of phase motion in a tilted washboard potential as often assumed. Heating effects and thermal fluctuations from the low-resistance state to a high-resistance, quasinormal regime appear to set independent upper bounds for the switching current.
|
|
|
Vercruyssen, N., Verhagen, T. G. A., Flokstra, M. G., Pekola, J. P., & Klapwijk, T. M. (2012). Evanescent states and nonequilibrium in driven superconducting nanowires. Phys. Rev. B, 85, 224503(1–10).
Abstract: We study the nonlinear response of current transport in a superconducting diffusive nanowire between normal reservoirs. We demonstrate theoretically and experimentally the existence of two different superconducting states appearing when the wire is driven out of equilibrium by an applied bias, called the global and bimodal superconducting states. The different states are identified by using two-probe measurements of the wire, and measurements of the local density of states with tunneling probes. The analysis is performed within the framework of the quasiclassical kinetic equations for diffusive superconductors.
|
|
|
Семенов, А. В., Девятов, И. А., Третьяков, И. В., Лобанов, Ю. В., Ожегов, Р. В., Петренко, Д. В., et al. (2011). Вывод уравнения типа уравнения гинзбурга-ландау для нанопроволоки вблизи критического магнитного поля. Ж. радиоэлектроники, 11, 4.
Abstract: Nonlinear Ginzburg-Landau equation for dirty supercondicting 1D wire is derived in the limit of high magnetic field.
В пределе больших магнитных полей выведено нелинейное уравнение Гинзбурга-Ландау, описывающее состояние одномерной «грязной» нанопроволоки.
|
|