|
|
Dorenbos SN, Reiger EM, Perinetti U, Zwiller V, Zijlstra T, Klapwijk TM. Low noise superconducting single photon detectors on silicon. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;93(13):131101.
|
|
|
|
Ganzevles WFM, Gao JR, de Korte PAJ, Klapwijk TM. Direct response of microstrip line coupled Nb THz hot-electron bolometer mixers. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;79(15):2483–5.
|
|
|
|
Floet DW, Baselmans JJA, Klapwijk TM, Gao JR. Resistive transition of niobium superconducting hot-electron bolometer mixers. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;73(19):2826.
|
|
|
|
Gao JR, Hajenius M, Yang ZQ, Baselmans JJA, Khosropanah P, Barends R, et al. Terahertz superconducting hot electron bolometer heterodyne receivers. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.. 2007;17(2):252–8.
Abstract: We highlight the progress on NbN hot electron bolometer (HEB) mixers achieved through fruitful collaboration between SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research and Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands. This includes the best receiver noise temperatures of 700 K at 1.63 THz using a twin-slot antenna mixer and 1050 K at 2.84 THz using a spiral antenna coupled HEB mixer. The mixers are based on thin NbN films on Si and fabricated with a new contact-process and-structure. By reducing their areas HEB mixers have shown an LO power requirement as low as 30 nW. Those small HEB mixers have demonstrated equivalent sensitivity as those with large areas provided the direct detection effect due to broadband radiation is removed. To manifest that a HEB based heterodyne receiver can in practice be used at arbitrary frequencies above 2 THz, we demonstrate a 2.8 THz receiver using a THz quantum cascade laser (QCL) as local oscillator.
|
|
|
|
Klapwijk TM, Semenov AV. Engineering physics of superconducting hot-electron bolometer mixers. IEEE Trans THz Sci Technol. 2017;7(6):627–48.
Abstract: Superconducting hot-electron bolometers are presently the best performing mixing devices for the frequency range beyond 1.2 THz, where good-quality superconductor-insulator-superconductor devices do not exist. Their physical appearance is very simple: an antenna consisting of a normal metal, sometimes a normal-metal-superconductor bilayer, connected to a thin film of a narrow short superconductor with a high resistivity in the normal state. The device is brought into an optimal operating regime by applying a dc current and a certain amount of local-oscillator power. Despite this technological simplicity, its operation has found to be controlled by many different aspects of superconductivity, all occurring simultaneously. A core ingredient is the understanding that there are two sources of resistance in a superconductor: a charge-conversion resistance occurring at a normal-metal-superconductor interface and a resistance due to time-dependent changes of the superconducting phase. The latter is responsible for the actual mixing process in a nonuniform superconducting environment set up by the bias conditions and the geometry. The present understanding indicates that further improvement needs to be found in the use of other materials with a faster energy relaxation rate. Meanwhile, several empirical parameters have become physically meaningful indicators of the devices, which will facilitate the technological developments.
|
|
